Priced per contact
The data vendor makes more money the more names you buy, whether or not any of them were worth having.
And we tell you, every month, how many of them we got wrong. One account a day each, with a reason, the evidence behind it, a way in, and a date it stops being true.
Be honest
Check all that apply.
Who we're against
The visible face of it is the AI SDR. Agents that dial, agents that write, agents that send. The pitch is a thousand personalised emails before lunch. The result is an inbox everyone has learned to ignore.
But that's a symptom. The enemy underneath is an entire industry whose only product is a bigger number.
The data vendor makes more money the more names you buy, whether or not any of them were worth having.
The sequencer makes more money the more messages you push, which is the exact behaviour that broke the channel.
The agency makes more money the lower the bar for a meeting gets. You find out three weeks later.
Not one of them makes a penny when you do less. We charge a flat fee, so we do.
The honest bit
You're running generic sequences across a few hundred semi-ICP accounts. Not because you think it works, but because targeted never paid you back for the effort. Fine. Leave that running.
Spend half your team's time on the one a day each we send instead. Nobody personalises at volume, whatever your vendor told you. So stop trying, and put the effort where it's worth spending.
Hundreds of accounts, no clear trigger, automated, generic. Low effort, and that's the right amount of effort. We don't touch it.
One a day, per rep, addressed to them by name. One reason each, the evidence behind it, and a way in. Half the team's time goes here.
The difference
| What you have | What you get |
|---|---|
| 4,000 accounts in a CSV | One a day, per rep, capped |
| "Matches your ICP" | The podcast clip, timestamped, with a link |
| Contact details | A named route in, or an honest flag saying there isn't one |
| A list that never expires, so it rots in the CRM | Every account has an expiry date and we delete it publicly |
| Nobody knows which trigger works | Published hit rate by trigger type, every month |
| The vendor claims credit for everything | A signed account ledger on day one, so sourced means sourced |
9:02am, your channel
Not a lead. Not a list row. Someone who knows, telling you quietly which one to go after and why. A rep can act on it without doing any research first, and check the whole thing themselves in under a minute.
Those four buttons are how we learn. Press the third one and we stop showing you accounts your team already owns. Press the fourth and one of us replies in that thread within a day. This is a real card we built this week, with the name, the company and the source links changed, because a real card belongs to the customer it was made for. On the one that went out, every link opened the page the claim came from, and the whole card took under a minute to check. That is the only kind of card we send.
The rules we hold ourselves to
Read this bit properly
What you don't get
No new tab at the top of your browser. No logo in the corner your team wonders about. No onboarding, no training, no seats, no dashboard nobody logs into.
There is AI in this. You never touch any of it. You see what comes out, in the channel your team already sits in, and you tell us whether it was any good.
Start here
We'll read your website, work out who your customers are, and find one person who used to work at one of them and has just landed somewhere new with a budget and the same problem. You'll get the account, the reason, the evidence, and how to get in.
No call. No CRM access. No trial to sign up for. If the account's no good, tell us and we'll have learned something.
Get your first nodTakes us about an hour. Takes you about a minute.